Trial
by Jury (Stimulating
Class Discussion)
|
|
OVERVIEW
|
|
|
This
technique utilizes a mock trial complete with witnesses,
prosecutors, defenders, friends of the court, and more. It is a
good method to spark “controversy learning”- learning by effectively
arguing a viewpoint and challenging the opposite view.
|
|
|
PROCEDURE
|
|
|
1.
Create an indictment that will help students see the different sides of an
issue. Examples of “crimes”
for which someone or something might be tried are: a literary character or
real person with moral
failings; a controversial book; an unproven theory; a value that does not
have merit; and a faulty
process, law, or institution.
|
|
|
2.
Assign roles to students. Depending on the number of students, you could
use all or some of these
roles: defendant,
defense attorney, defense witnesses, prosecuting attorney, prosecution
witnesses,
friends of the court, judge, jury member. Each role can be filled by one
person or by a team. You could
have any number in the jury.
|
|
|
3.
Allow time for students to prepare. This could be a few minutes up to an
hour, depending on the
complexity of the issue.
|
|
|
4.
Conduct the trial. Consider using these activities: opening arguments,
case presented by the
prosecutor and
witnesses, friend of the court briefs, and closing arguments.
|
|
|
5.
Conduct the jury deliberations. These should be done publicly, so everyone
can hear how the evidence
is being weighed.
Non-jury members can be given an assignment to listen for various aspects
of the
case.
|
|
|
VARIATIONS
|
|
|
1.
Extend the activity by staging a retrial.
|
|
|
2.
Eliminate a trial by jury and substitute a trial by judge only.
|